Composite Shingles
Engineered roofing shingles made from a blend of synthetic polymers, recycled materials, and fiberglass, designed to replicate the appearance of natural slate, wood shake, or tile at a lower weight and cost.
Specifications
| Materials | Engineered polymers, recycled plastics, fiberglass, rubber compounds |
| Weight | Typically 150 to 300 lbs per square (lighter than natural slate or clay tile) |
| Typical Lifespan | 30 to 50 years depending on manufacturer and product |
| Fire Rating | Class A on most products |
| Impact Resistance | Most products achieve Class 4 UL 2218 |
Common issues
- Higher cost than standard asphalt shingles, though lower than natural materials they replicate
- Limited long-term track record compared to asphalt, natural slate, and metal (most products are 10 to 20 years old in the market)
- Color fading over time on some products, particularly lighter colors on south-facing slopes
- Availability limited to specific regions or direct-order in some markets
Insurance relevance
Composite shingles occupy a premium product tier with replacement costs higher than asphalt but lower than natural slate or tile. Adjusters should identify the specific manufacturer and product because Xactimate may not have a pre-built line item for every composite brand. The Class A fire rating and Class 4 impact resistance that most composites carry can qualify for insurance premium discounts. When a composite roof is damaged, replacement must match the type; substituting asphalt is not acceptable. Sourcing and lead times can extend the claim timeline if the product is not stocked locally.
What Are Composite Shingles
Composite shingles (also called synthetic shingles) are engineered roofing products made from blends of polymers, recycled plastics, rubber, and fiberglass. They are manufactured in molds that replicate the texture, profile, and shadow lines of natural slate, cedar shake, or clay tile. The result is a product that looks like a premium natural material from the ground but weighs a fraction of the original and can be installed by standard roofing crews without the specialized skills required for natural slate or tile work. Major composite shingle manufacturers include DaVinci Roofscapes, Brava Roof Tile, CeDUR, and EcoStar. Each uses a proprietary formulation, but the general concept is the same: engineered material, natural aesthetic, lighter weight, and strong impact resistance.
Performance Characteristics
Composite shingles offer several performance advantages over both natural materials and standard asphalt. They are lighter than slate (150 to 300 pounds per square versus 800 to 1,500 for slate), eliminating the structural reinforcement that natural slate requires. Most composite products achieve Class A fire rating and Class 4 impact resistance under UL 2218, making them among the best-performing shingles for combined fire and hail protection. The polymer-based construction resists cracking, splitting, and moisture absorption, which are common failure modes in natural slate and wood shake. In freeze-thaw climates, composites do not delaminate or spall the way some natural stone products do. Wind ratings vary by product but are generally competitive with premium architectural asphalt shingles.
Limitations and Considerations
The primary limitation of composite shingles is their relatively short market history. Most products have been available for only 10 to 20 years, which means 50-year warranty claims are not yet proven by field data. Manufacturers rely on accelerated aging tests and material science projections for long-term durability claims. Color stability over decades is another open question, as UV exposure affects polymer-based products differently than ceramic granules on asphalt or natural stone. Cost is higher than asphalt, typically two to three times the installed price of architectural asphalt shingles, though significantly less than natural slate or cedar shake. Availability can be limited in regions where composite shingle distribution is not well established, which can affect both initial installation and future repair sourcing.
Composite Shingles and Insurance
For insurance purposes, composite shingles fall into a premium product category that requires accurate identification. Not all Xactimate databases include pre-built line items for every composite brand, so the adjuster or estimator may need to create a custom line item based on the manufacturer's material cost and the contractor's labor rate. The Class A fire and Class 4 impact ratings qualify for insurance premium discounts in states that offer them. When a composite roof is damaged by a covered peril, the replacement must match. An adjuster cannot substitute asphalt shingles for a composite roof. If the original product is discontinued or the specific color is unavailable, the replacement should be the current equivalent from the same or comparable manufacturer. Document the product name, manufacturer, and color from packaging, installation records, or the manufacturer's online product archive to support the claim.
Frequently asked questions
Asphalt shingles use a fiberglass mat coated with asphalt and surfaced with ceramic granules. Composite shingles are engineered from synthetic polymers, recycled materials, and fiberglass without an asphalt base. Composites are designed to look like natural slate, cedar shake, or tile, while asphalt shingles have their own distinct appearance (or are laminated to mimic wood shake in architectural versions). Composite shingles are typically lighter than natural materials, more impact-resistant than standard asphalt, and carry Class A fire ratings.
Manufacturers typically warrant composite shingles for 30 to 50 years. However, most composite shingle products have been on the market for only 10 to 20 years, so long-term real-world performance data is still accumulating. Early-generation products have performed well in field observations, with the engineered polymer base showing strong resistance to cracking, curling, and impact damage. The primary concern is UV-driven color change over multi-decade timeframes.
Composite shingles make the most sense for homeowners who want the aesthetic of natural slate or cedar shake without the extreme weight, fragility, or cost. They are significantly cheaper than real slate (which can be three to five times the cost) and lighter, eliminating the need for structural reinforcement. For homeowners who do not need the natural material aesthetic, standard architectural asphalt shingles offer strong performance at a lower price point.
Convert your PDF to ESX
Upload a PDF estimate. CapOut processes it and sends it directly to your Xactimate account.
Get started free
No credit card required